Sample Report
Here is a sample report similar to what you will receive at the end of your home inspection.
Report Property: 123 Main Street, Miramichi, NB
Property Inspection Date: January 20, 2010
Inspection Time: 1:00 pm – 5:20 pm
Inspection by: Karen Howe, PTech, CET, CHI
Report prepared for: Client Name
Inspection Report
Summary
Property inspected is a two storey, 3 bedroom home c/w attached two-car garage within city limits. Building is 13 years old and appears well-maintained. Climate during inspection was cold and snowing. Landscaping and building were snow covered, which hindered inspection of the roof and the building site. Inspection was 4hr 20m and included basement, main floor, second floor, and garage.
Deficiency Summary
Inspection Report
1. SITE
a. Site was snow covered, but appeared to be well graded and sloped away from the building. No major vegetation was evidenced near the foundation. Perimeter of building has layer of crushed stone which will aid in the drainage of water from site.
b. Asphalt driveway appears well maintained and slopes away from the garage. Regular maintenance of driveway is recommended.
c. Retaining wall for flower bed near front step is plumb and solid, and stone walkway was level with no tripping hazards.
d. Building is within city limits and therefore does not have a septic field.
e. This report does not include geological or soil conditions. For this information a Geotechnical Engineer should be consulted.
2. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
a. Building foundation consists of concrete basement c/w frost wall below garage. Exterior of foundation could not be inspected due to backfill, other than that which protrudes above soil level.
i. Some minor settlement cracks at perimeter (< 1/8”) as wellas some minor honeycombing below living room window.
ii. No evidence of leaning, buckling or improper renovations to the foundation wall appear from the exterior.
iii. Entire perimeter of interior basement walls is covered and therefore not visible for inspection. Existing drywall and framing does not show any sign of moisture intrusion from the foundation walls.
iv. Basement floor has a previously repaired crack.
1. Crack was up to ½” wide in places.
2. Repair was not recent.
3. Minor re-cracking was evident, but there is no evidence that the crack is spreading in any direction.
4. No sign of efflorescence, mold growth or staining that would indicate the presence of moisture.
5. Crack appears to be a settlement crack which has stabilized. Recommend structural engineer toevaluate should crack begin to spread.
6. New walls framed on existing floor have been properly gasketed.
i. Structure that is visible consists of 2x10 wood construction c/w blocking. No major notches, cracks or decay were evident.
ii. Floors appeared sound and level except for ensuite bath. Floor in this area sloped towards shower and was slightly creaky. Based upon the inspection of the ceramic tile, it appears as though the creaking is not affecting the structure (no cracks in tile evident), however a flooring specialist should review to confirm. No evidence of moisture or wood deterioration was present in ensuite bath. Recommend recaulking/regrouting at trim in order to prevent moisture entrance to area below ensuite tub. Recommend recaulking/regrouting at main bathroom tub.
iii. Ceiling area below ensuite bath showed no evidence of moisture problems.
i. Interior was dry with no evidence of moisture, and no evidence of deterioration/decay of wood. Testing of random sampling of members showed moisture levels well below acceptable limits.
ii. Sheathing in inspected area appeared dry and tight.
iii. Roof members were straight/plumb with no sign of buckling or sagging. Some minor cracking/splintering of members was evidenced, but appears to be the result of drying wood and not a cause for concern.
3. EXTERIOR
a. Exterior of home is covered with vinyl siding c/w vinyl/aluminum trim. Some evidence of proper house wrap was noted, but continuity cannot be commented upon.
i. Majority of siding in good condition. Some general buckling in various areas.
ii. Some siding cracking was visible. As vinyl siding ages, it becomes more brittle and caution should be taken to notfurther damage the siding. Minor cracking is not problematic, only indicative of the age of the siding and a useful determinate as to the functional life of the siding. This vinyl siding may soon be nearing the end of its useful life and replacement will be necessary at some point in the future.
iii. Below bay window in kitchen there is no soffit or any type of enclosure to prevent the entrance of rodents or other pests. It is also a potential entrance for moisture, although not probable given the location. Recommend installation of covering over vapour barrier.
It should be noted that water runoff from the roof is a prime factor in basement leakage, and every attempt should be made to direct runoff away from the home.
i. Recommend regular inspection by homeowner to clear debris from eavestroughs, particularly particulates from shingles. Excessive debris from the shingles is an indicator of the potential future lifespan of the shingled roof.
ii. Roof-to-roof drainage at the rear of the garage is too great a gap. Recommend extending the length of the downspoutdirectly into the eavestrough to prevent further damage to the roof and to prevent water backup into the wall system.
iii. Downspouts at front door, garage door and front left corner of the home have neither splashblocks nor extensions. Recommend installation of extensions to direct water away from foundation and to prevent water damage to basement.
iv. Eavestroughs are not water tested for leakage or blockage. These components require regular maintenance to avoid water problems at the roof and foundation.
4. ROOF SYSTEM
a. Roofing is composed of asphalt shingles. Most of the roof was snow covered and not visible for inspection. Roof was inspected from ground level with binoculars, from garage eave with a ladder, and from a second storey window with binoculars.
i. Minerals from the shingles were evident in the eavestrough which can be an indicator of the potential lifespan of the shingles. Recommend monitoring roof for bare patches or buckling shingles not visible during inspection.
ii. Shingles visible from eaves appeared to be well fastened, and in good condition. Multiple layers not in evidence. It could possibly be assumed that the balance of the shingles is in similar condition.
iii. Roofing over front porch appeared to be asphalt shingles near eaves, but between eave and wall appeared to be rolled roofing. Due to snow and distance from area, closer inspection was not possible. Area between wall and porch roof was covered in aluminum flashing. Flashing was not broken, cracked or punctured. No evidence of moisture intrusion inside the home was found. Excessive growth of moss at window corner is possible evidence of excess moisture retention. Recommend removal of moss and qualified roofer to evaluate condition of wood below.
iv. Shingles appear to be mid-way through their useable life span.
5. PLUMBING SYSTEM
a. Plumbing for the home is tied into the municipal system for both water and sewage.
i. Water Supply
1. Meter is installed securely and is c/w with master shut-off valve in basement room along with water softener.
2. Supply lines consisted of ¾” copper lines.
3. Distribution lines that were visible were copper with some plastic.
4. Water flow and pressure was average.
5. Most faucets were functioning and solid and most were dripless.
a. Faucet in shower in main bath continued to drip for some time after being turned off. Turning on faucet took some force. Recommend replacing faucet in main bathroom shower.
b. Faucet handle in ensuite shower somewhat loose. Recommend tightening or replacement of faucet.
6. Water softening system is functional. Efficiency is not evaluated nor part of this inspection.
ii. Hot water supply
1. Cascade 60 electric water heater supplied and owned by NB Power. Date plate on tank indicates tank is 15 years old.
2. Tank supplies 60 gal/mr
3. Tank in good condition with no rust, corrosion, or leaks and proper automatic safety controls
iii. Waste piping
1. Piping that was visible was PVC.
2. All drains functioned well with no apparent blockages or leaks.
3. Main cleanout located in basement room with water meter.
4. No odors, moisture or other evidence of leaks.
5. Ensuite shower drain continued to sound of dripping water long after shower was empty of water. While not indicative of a plumbing problem, it can be an annoyance. Recommend cleaning of drain to prevent water retention.
iv. All fixtures including sinks, toilets, showers, tubs and surrounds were securely installed with no stains, cracks, mildew or evidence of leaks. All fixtures were properly caulked.
v. Concealed/underground plumbing not inspected or judged for leaks or deterioration.
vi. Isolating/relief and main valves not tested.
vii. Testing for water quality, lead and other hazardous materials is not part of this inspection.
viii. Hose bib at front door has apparent leak. Recommend replacing with new hose bib.
6. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
i. Panel contains neat and even wiring, no double tapping or mismatched wire-to-breaker amperages.
ii. No unconnected or abandoned wires were in the panel, nor missing breakers.
iii. Panel has ample room for additional breakers to be added.
iv. Panel was labeled, but labels appear to be fading and should be redone.
v. Separate circuits were used for large appliances and split circuits were utilized for the kitchen.
7. HVAC SYSTEM
8. INTERIOR
9. INSULATION AND VENTILATION
i. Insulation consists of 9” of blown in place cellulose insulation. Recommended levels, prior to settling, are 10-12” of insulation to acquire R40 value. Insulations does not show any evidence of moisture, dirt or rodents. Insulation levels are consistent through visible area. Recommend additional insulation is installed as required.
ii. Venting consists of ridge vents and baffles. Vents and baffles are unobstructed.
i. Walls covered with drywall, but small area in furnace room shows evidence of proper vapour barrier and insulation. Area above basement window is missing insulation. Recommend installing proper batt insulation above window.
i. Kitchen exhaust fan is functioning with sufficient exhaust power. Lights on hood were not tested as no bulbs were installed in the unit.
ii. Bathroom exhaust fans are operational, but ensuite exhaust does not have sufficient exhaust power. With the presence of windows, an exhaust fan is not a necessity, but recommends evaluation by a technician.
iii. Dryer is properly vented to the outdoor. Recommend cleaning on a yearly basis to lower fire hazard.
10.FIREPLACES AND SOLID FUEL BURING APPLIANCES
i. Exterior flue shows no sign of soot, corrosion or damage.
ii. Flames burned consistently with no evidence of improper firing.
iii. Proper shut-off valve in place.
iv. Exterior fuel storage tank place on level gravel surface. Tank was in good condition with no evidence of rust, corrosion or damage. Date on tank: 2004.
v. Thermostat was not checked for calibration.
vi. No pressure testing was done on the storage tank.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
a. Central vacuum, model Broan V20C-1, appears to be functional. Life of the vacuum cannot be commented upon. Recommend regular cleaning of system to maintain fullest possible life.
b. Built-in appliances were functional, but otherwise not inspected for efficiency. Dishwasher shows no evidence of moisture leakage.
c. Smoke detectors were not tested. Recommend the installation of carbon monoxide detectors.
d. No inspection was done of the security system as installed in the home.
e. Concealed areas are not inspected including: vapour barrier continuity, insulation. Recommend Thermal Infrared inspector to evaluated building envelope.
f. Cosmetic finishes not commented upon, nor is condition of flooring hidden by large pieces of furniture.
|